Financial Regulators Urged to Stay Vigilant Amid Resurfacing Crisis Threats
Concerns are mounting on the financial front, with recent developments indicating the resurgence of global debt to unprecedented levels, raising questions about the effectiveness of financial supervisors in monitoring potential risks.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) of the G-20 issued a warning in August, highlighting the looming challenges and shocks on the horizon. They cited the threat posed by high-interest rates, which could undermine economic recovery and disrupt vital sectors like real estate.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) underscored the critical role of vigilant financial supervision in maintaining stability. They emphasized the need for supervisors to act decisively to prevent a recurrence of past banking and financial crises, including those in 2008 and the more recent one earlier this year.
The IMF's Financial Counsellor Tobias Adrian, along with other experts, stressed that effective supervision is just as vital as risk management, governance within banks, robust regulations, and active market oversight.
The Institute of International Finance (IIF) added to the concerns by revealing that global debt surged by $10 trillion in the first half of 2023, reaching a record high of $307 trillion. This figure is a staggering $100 trillion more than a decade ago, with mature markets like the US, Japan, the UK, and France contributing significantly to this increase. Emerging markets, particularly China, India, and Brazil, also saw substantial growth in debt levels.
Despite rising prices providing some relief, the global debt-to-GDP ratio has resumed its upward trajectory, reaching 336%. High inflation, increased borrowing costs, and stricter lending standards have curtailed bank credit creation, but private credit markets continue to expand despite heightened regulatory scrutiny.
The IIF cautioned that higher interest rates and growing debt burdens could intensify domestic debt strains, while the current international financial framework may not be adequately equipped to address unsustainable domestic debt levels.
The IMF, in a separate blog post, echoed these concerns, questioning the strength of banks' risk management practices and the adequacy of prudential regulations and banking supervision. The IMF officials emphasized the need for financial sector supervisors to have clear mandates focused on identifying potential trouble spots and sufficient legal powers to act effectively.
They pointed to the 2008 global financial crisis as a stark reminder of the importance of assertive and intrusive supervision, noting that "light-touch supervision" has proven unsuccessful in preventing crises.
While these warnings may not sit well with some sectors of the banking and financial industry, they resonate with the broader community that endured the impact of the global financial crisis. The looming threat of potential crises, particularly in the non-bank or shadow banking sector, is a cause for concern. The FSB's report highlighted a group of hedge funds as a potential source of financial market instability due to their "very high levels of synthetic leverage," reminiscent of the sub-prime mortgage crisis.
Latest News
Recommended news